Blog - ASEDUCATIVA

Olivia Moore Olivia Moore

0 Curso Matriculado • 0 Curso Realizado

Biografía

Test ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Collection - Latest Study ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Questions

Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study braindumps can be very good to meet user demand in this respect, allow the user to read and write in a good environment continuously consolidate what they learned. Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor prep guide has high quality. So there is all effective and central practice for you to prepare for your test. With our professional ability, we can accord to the necessary testing points to edit ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions. So high quality ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor materials can help you to pass your exam effectively, make you feel easy, to achieve your goal.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO
IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.

Topic 2

Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.

Topic 3

Closing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.

>> Test ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Collection <<

Latest Study ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Questions, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Latest Exam Question

In the process of using the ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam study question, if the user has some problems, the IT professor will 24 hours online to help users solve, the user can send email or contact us on the online platform. Of course, a lot of problems such as soft test engine appeared some faults or abnormal stating run phenomenon of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam question, these problems cannot be addressed by simple language, we will service a secure remote assistance for users and help users immediate effectively solve the existing problems of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Torrent prep, thus greatly enhance the user experience, beneficial to protect the user's learning resources and use digital tools, let users in a safe and healthy environment to study ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam question.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q18-Q23):

NEW QUESTION # 18
Question:
Which of the following is NOT a guide's responsibility?

A. Witnessing the audit activities on behalf of the client
B. Establishing contacts and timing for interviews
C. Drafting and communicating the conclusions of the audit

Answer: C

Explanation:
Aguideis typically a representative of the auditee assigned to assist the audit team, not to perform audit duties.
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.4.7states:"The responsibilities of guides include establishing contacts, arranging visits, ensuring safety, and facilitating communication - but not evaluating or concluding audit findings."
* Drafting and communicating audit conclusionsis the responsibility of theaudit team leaderunderISO
/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.6.
Reference:ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.4.7; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.4.6.

NEW QUESTION # 19
Scenario 2 (continued):
Empsy HR Solutions is a human resources consulting company that provides innovative HR solutions to diverse industries.Recognizing the significant impact of artificial intelligence Al in HR processes, including its ability to automate repetitive tasks, analyzevast amounts of data for insights, improve recruitment and talent management strategies, and personalize employee experiences, thecompany has initiated the implementation of an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001.
Initially, the top management established an Al policy that was aligned with the company's objectives. The Al policy provided a frameworkfor defining Al objectives, a commitment to meeting relevant requirements, and a dedication to continually improve the AIMS. However, it did not refer to other organizational policies, although some were relevant to the AIMS. Afterward, the top management documented thepolicy, communicated it internally, and made it accessible to interested parties.
The top management designated specific individuals to ensure that the AIMS meets the standard's requirements. Additionally, theyensured that these individuals were responsible for overseeing theAIMS, reporting its performance to the top management, andfacilitating continual improvement. Moreover, in its awareness sessions, the company focused exclusively on ensuring that all personnel were informed about the Al policy, emphasizing their role in ensuring the effectiveness of the AIMS and the benefits of enhanced Alperformance.
The company also planned, implemented, and monitored processes to meet AIMS requirements. Additionally, it set clear criteria andimplemented controls based on them, ensuring effective operation, alignment with organizational objectives, and continual improvement.Empsy HR Solutions decided to implement strict measures to control changes to documented information within the AIMS. To ensure theintegrity and accuracy of documentation, the company adopted version control practices. Each document update was tracked using aversioning system, with clear records of what was modified, who made the changes, and when the updates occurred. Access to makechanges was restricted to authorized personnel, and any proposed modifications required approval from the designated managementteam before being implemented.
Moreover, considering past experiences where the company encountered unforeseen risks, Empsy HR Solutions established acomprehensive Al risk assessment process. This process involved identifying, analyzing, and evaluating Al risks to determine if it isnecessary to implement additional controls than those specified in Annex A. The company also referred to Annex B for guidance onimplementing controls and, ultimately, produced a Statement of Applicability SoA. The SoA contained the necessary controls, including allthe controls of Annex A and justifications for their inclusion or exclusion.
Lastly. Empsy HR Solutions decided to establish an internal audit program to ensure the AIMS conforms to both the company'srequirements and ISO/IEC 42001. It defined the audit objectives, criteria, and scope for each audit, selected auditors, and ensuredobjectivity and impartiality during the audit process. The results of the first audit were documented and reported only to the top management of the company.
Question:
Based on Scenario 2, was the awareness session conducted in accordance with the requirements of Clause 7.3 Awareness of ISO/IEC 42001?

A. No, the awareness session should also communicate the implications of not conforming to the AIMS requirements
B. Yes, because awareness sessions focus only on AI policy
C. Yes, the awareness session informed employees about the AI policy and highlighted their role in ensuring the effectiveness of the AIMS
D. No, the awareness session should also explain the justification for the inclusion and the exclusion of Annex A controls

Answer: A

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 7.3 requires that awareness training should not only inform employees about the AI policy and roles but alsocommunicate the implications of nonconformancewith AIMS requirements. Since Empsy HR Solutions missed this, it is non-compliant.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 7.3 (Awareness).

NEW QUESTION # 20
A company develops an AI-based health monitoring system that provides insights and recommendations to users. However, users have reported that they do not understand how the system arrives at its recommendations. Which core element should the company enhance to improve user trust and understanding?

A. Safety and Reliability
B. Human-Centered Design
C. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
D. Transparency and Explainability

Answer: D

Explanation:
The issue in this case revolves aroundusers not understanding the reasoning or logicbehind the AI- generated recommendations. The relevant core element isTransparency and Explainability.
According toISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 and Clause 8.2.3, transparency refers to theclarity of processes, decisions, and data use, while explainability focuses on makingAI system outputs understandableto human users.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guideidentifies this as a key factor in buildingtrust, usability, and ethical AI adoption, especially insensitive domainslike healthcare.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 6.1.2 (Risk and impact assessment), Clause 8.2.3 (Controls related to operational use) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: "Transparency and Explainability" in AI Ethics

NEW QUESTION # 21
Scenario 9 (continued):
Scenario 9: Securisai, located in Tallinn.Estonia, specializes in the development of automated cybersecurity solutions that utilize AIsystems. The company recently implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001. Indoing so, the company aimed to manage its Al-driven systems' capabilities to detect and mitigate cyber threats more efficiently andethically. As part of its commitment to upholding the highest standards of Al use and management, Securisai underwent a certificationaudit to demonstrate compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
The audit process comprised two main stages: the initial or stage 1 audit focused on reviewingSecurisai's documentation, policies, andprocedures related to its AIMS. This review laid the groundwork for the stage 2 audit, which involved a comprehensive, on-site evaluation of the actual implementation and effectiveness of the AIMS within Securisai's operations. The goal was to observe the AIMS in operation,ensuring that it not only existed on paper but was effectively integrated into the company's daily activities and cybersecurity strategies.
After the audit, Roger, Securisai's internal auditor, addressed the action plans devised to rectify nonconformities identified during thecertification audit. He developed a long term strategy, highlighting key AIMS processes for triennial audits. Roger's internal audits play a key role in advancing Securisai's goals by employing a systematic and disciplined method to assess and boost the efficiency of risk management, governance processes, and strategic decision-making. Roger reported his findings directly to Securisai's top management.
Following the successful rectification of nonconformities, Securisai was officially certified against ISO/IEC
42001.
Recently, the company decided to transfer its ISO/IEC 42001 certification registration from one certification body to another despitebeing initially bound by a long-term agreement with the current certification body.
This decision was motivated by the desire to partnerwith a certification body that offers deeper insights and expertise in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
To ensure a smooth transition and uphold its certification status, Securisai is diligently compiling the required documentation forsubmission to the new certification body. This includes a formal request, the most recent audit report underscoring its adherence toISO/IEC 42001, the latest corrective action plan that highlights its continuous efforts toward improvement, and a copy of its current validcertification registration.
A year following Securisai's initial certification audit, a subsequent audit was carried out by the certification body on its AIMS. The purpose of this audit was to assess compliance with ISO/IEC 42001 and verify the ongoing improvement of the AIMS. The audit team concluded that Securisai's AIMS consistently meets the requirements set by ISO/IEC 42001.
Roger followed up on action plans after the external audit at Securisai, but he was directly involved in strategic decision-making processes, potentially affecting his audit objectivity.
Question:
Based on Scenario 9, which principle of internal auditing did Roger violate?

A. Objectivity
B. Independence
C. Integrity

Answer: B

Explanation:
Independenceis compromised when an auditor has direct involvement in the management or decision-making processes of the system being audited.
* ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 4.5defines independence as:"The basis for the impartiality and objectivity of the audit conclusions."
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5reinforces that personnel auditing must be free from involvement in the area audited.
* By participating in strategic decision-making, Roger violated the independence principle.
Reference:ISO/IEC 19011:2018 Clause 4.5; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5.

NEW QUESTION # 22
Question:
DenSolutions, a financial institution, is seeking to certify its AIMS. The certification body appointed Sarah as the audit team leader, who previously provided consultancy services regarding the AIMS. Can Sarah audit the AIMS of DenSolutions?

A. Yes, if a minimum of two years have passed following the end of the consultancy
B. Yes, with approval from the auditee
C. No - auditors who contribute to the design, implementation, and maintenance of the AIMS cannot participate in AIMS audits
D. Yes, if the auditor does not directly audit any component of the AIMS they consulted on and only oversees the audit process

Answer: C

Explanation:
Sarahcannot auditbecause auditors who have contributed to the design, implementation, or maintenance of a management systemmust not audit that same systemto avoid conflict of interest.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5clearly states:"Personnel who have provided management system consultancy, including those acting in a managerial capacity, shall not be used to conduct audits."
* TheLead Auditor Guideexplains:"Maintaining impartiality requires that individuals with consultancy roles be excluded from auditing the systems they helped create." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 5.2.5; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Training Material, Conflict of Interest Management.

NEW QUESTION # 23
......

It will improve your skills to face the difficulty of the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam questions and accelerate the way to success in IT filed with our latest study materials. Free demo of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor dumps pdf can be downloaded before purchase and 24/7 customer assisting support can be access. Well preparation of ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Practice Test will be closer to your success and get authoritative certification easily.

Latest Study ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Questions: https://www.testkingfree.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-practice-exam-dumps.html